Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 141893 (ALL)

GYANMATI AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE U.P. LKO. AND 10 OTHERS

WRIC/5110/2025 · 2025-06-03

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34294-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5110 of 2025 Petitioner :- Gyanmati And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue U.P. Lko. And 10 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shiv Kumar Yadav,Mata Prasad Chaturvedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Praveen Kumar Giri,J. 1. Heard. 2. Petitioners say that though consequent to demarcation of Gata No.705 in 2022, 'Patharnasab' exercise was undertaken but the encroachments were not removed as was required under sub-Section (2) of Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and the Rules made corresponding thereto. 3. Let the petitioners move a representation before the Sub- Divisional Magistrate concerned who may get the facts verified as to how far he has jurisdiction in the matter to restore the encroachments and if he has then do the needful but only as per law otherwise, the petitioners will have to pursue other remedies. 4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. (Praveen Kumar Giri,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 3.6.2025 Shanu/- Digitally signed by :- SHANU SUMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench