MADHU BANDRAL v. SURESH KUMAR TH.HOME DEPTT.AND ORS.
CPSW/517/2014 · 2025-12-20
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14186 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14186 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 31
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case : CPSW No. 517/2014
Madhu Bandral …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through: None. V/s
Suresh Kumar and others ... Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Assisting counsel to Mr. Monika Kohli, Sr.AAG
CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
ORDER 20.12.2025
Learned counsel for the respondents, at the outset, has drawn attention of the Court to the response submitted on behalf of the respondents. And, with reference to the averments set out in Para 3 thereof, she submits that the claim of the petitioner was considered and rejected by the Competent Authority in consultation with the General Administration Department being devoid of merit and a speaking order dated June 25, 2014 was passed in this regard. That being so, nothing substantive survives in the petition and the same is, accordingly, disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
(
(ARUN PALLI)
CHIEF JUSTICE Jammu : 20.12.2025 Pawan Chopra/Secy
Pawan Chopra 2025.12.22 16:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document