ARUN KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/5109/2025 · 2025-06-03
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 141855 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 141855 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5109 of 2025 Petitioner :- Arun Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sudhakar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Praveen Kumar Giri,J.
1. Petitioner seeks modification/correction in the revenue record. The writ petition is not the remedy. The remedy lies under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and, if any Court or authority is obliged to take action thereunder but does not do so, then it would be under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, in view of the judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court of India in S.K. Sarkar, Member, Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow vs. Vinay Chandra Misra; AIR 1981 SC 723, wherein the revenue courts have been held to be amenable to the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. We have already considered this aspect in our order dated 24.10.2024 passed in Writ C No. 9158 of 2024 (Dan Singh @ Dan Singh Yadav And 8 Others vs. State of U.P. and others).
2. This petition is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to pursue other remedies. Order Date :- 3.6.2025 DKS (Praveen Kumar Giri,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Digitally signed by :- DEEPAK KUMAR SRIVASTWA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench