HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4533 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Syed Suleman Abbas, leaned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the material placed on record. By means of instant application, the applicants have prayed for quashing of the entire proceedings of S.T. No. 1149 of 2014; State Vs. Mohit and others, arising out of Case Crime No. 483 of 2023, under Sections 323, 504 IPC, Police Station Thakurganj, District Lucknow as well as chargesheet No. 1 of 2024, on the basis of compromise dated 26.04.2025. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in the instant mater. He added that later on, the parties sat together and have amicably settled their disputes, which has been reduced in writing on 26.04.2025 which has been annexed as Annexure No. SA-1 to the supplementary affidavit dated 24.08.2025. Thereafter, this Court vide order dated 28.05.2025 directed the court below to verify the said compromise deed and in compliance thereof, the compromise deed was verified on 12.06.2025. He submits that now there is no dispute in between the parties and they have settled their dispute. He submits that further criminal proceedings in the instant matter would amount to harassment and, thus, the instant criminal proceedings against the applicants may be Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Irshad Ali, Archana Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Syed Suleman Abbas Mohit Lal Yadav @ Mohit And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) quashed. Learned counsel appearing for opposite party no. 2 has also supported the version of the learned counsel for the applicants and submits that parties have amicably settled their dispute and the opposite party no. 2 has no grievance, hence, criminal proceedings against the applicants may be dropped. Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the submissions aforesaid. Considering the aforesaid submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, I find that compromise has been entered into between the parties on 26.04.2025 and said compromise has been verified on 12.06.2025 and, now, as per the statement of learned counsel for the parties, they do not want to press the aforementioned criminal proceedings against the applicant. In view of the above, as the applicant and opposite parties have entered into compromise on 26.04.2025 and no grievance remains to be agitated and as such, further criminal proceedings in the aforementioned criminal case are liable to be set aside in view of the Judgments of the Apex Court rendered in B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another (2003) 4 SCC 675; Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (2008) 9 SCC 677; Manoj Sharma Vs. State and others, (2008) 16 SCC 1; Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303; and Narindra Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab (2014) 6 SCC 466. Resultantly, the proceedings of S.T. No. 1149 of 2014; State Vs. Mohit and others, arising out of Case Crime No. 483 of 2023, under Sections 323, 504 IPC, Police Station Thakurganj, District Lucknow, are hereby quashed. The compromise deed shall be part of this order. Consequences to be followed. The application is allowed accordingly. August 28, 2025 kkv/ A482 No. 4533 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench