Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 141830 (ALL)

DHEERENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. BASIC EDU. LKO. U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/5850/2025 · 2025-05-30

Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34086 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5850 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dheerendra Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Edu. Lko. U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Pratap Singh,Armaan Surendra Tiwari,S.C. Misra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Prashant Kumar Singh,Ran Vijay Singh Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Daya Shankar Tiwari, learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 1 and 3, Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and Sri Prashant Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 4. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed the following reliefs:- "i. Issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the opposite parties to consider and decide the mutual transfer request of the Petitioner, in accordance with law, within a reasonable time as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court. ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, directing the opposite parties to consider effect the mutual transfer of the Petitioner to Primary School Ghatwasa from Primary School Banamau." At the very outset, Sri Prashant Kumar Singh has stated that on account of the bonafide mistake on the part of Block Education Officer, the correct information in respect of the request of the petitioner has not been provided to the opposite party no. 2 on the portal, therefore, such Officer has been directed to provide proper information in respect of the petitioner so that any appropriate decision may be taken. Be that as it may, since, the petitioner has applied online and there is no fault on his part, therefore, if there is any bonafide fault on the part of Block Education Officer, the same shall be corrected by the officers and proper information shall be sent on the portal so that the opposite party no. 2 may take appropriate decision. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage directing the opposite party no. 4 to take appropriate steps so that the grievance of the petitioner could be redressed by the opposite party no. 2. The aforesaid steps shall be taken with promptness so that any appropriate decision may be taken within time so decided by the competent authorities. It is made clear that I have not entered into the merits of the case, therefore, the authorities concerned may take independent decision strictly in accordance with law. Order Date :- 30.5.2025 Anurag Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench