SANGAM KUMAR VERMA AND 10 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/4453/2025 · 2025-07-03
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 141808 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 141808 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:37806 Court No. - 15 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4453 of 2025 Applicant :- Sangam Kumar Verma And 10 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vivek Chandra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Himanshu Shukla Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard Sri Vivek Chandra, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Diwakar Singh, the learned A.G.A for the State and Sri Himanshu Shukla, the learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2.
2. The instant application has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C, the applicant has sought quashing of the charge-sheet dated 24.09.2022, summoning order dated 27.09.2022 as well as the entire proceedings of Case no.264 of 2024 arising out of Case Crime No. 133 of 2022, under Sections 419, 420, 409, 109 I.P.C, Police Station Baddupur, District Barabanki pending in the court of Ld. Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barabanki on the basis of compromise between the parties.
3. The quashing of the proceedings has been sought on the ground that the parties have entered into a compromise on 21.05.2025, a copy whereof has been annexed with the affidavit.
4. On 27.05.2025, this Court had directed the trial court to verify the compromise. The compromise has been verified by means of an order dated 10.06.2025 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barabanki. It is stated in the compromise that the parties are related to each other and the opposite party no.2 does not want any further proceedings against the applicant.
5. The learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 2 has supported the prayer made by the applicant and has given his consent for proceedings being quashed on the basis of compromise.
6. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and the entire proceedings of the charge-sheet dated 24.09.2022, summoning
order dated 27.09.2022 as well as the entire proceedings of Case no.264 of 2024 arising out of Case Crime No. 133 of 2022, under Sections 419, 420, 409, 109 I.P.C, Police Station Baddupur, District Barabanki pending in the court of Ld. Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barabanki are hereby quashed. . (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.)
Order Date :- 3.7.2025 -Amit K- Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench