Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34409 Court No. - 12 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4926 of 2025 Applicant :- Jeeva Saroj @ Aman Saroj Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Avanish Kumar Singh,Avanindra Singh Parihar,Maitryee Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Supplementary Affidavit filed by learned counsel for the petitioner is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record. The present bail application has been filed by accused-applicant seeking bail in Case Crime No.61 of 2025 under Sections 310(2), 127 (7) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (B.N.S.) 2023, Police Station Raniganj, District Pratapgarh. In the prosecution case, it is alleged that on 11.03.2025, at around 1:00 PM, the applicant, along with co-accused persons, allegedly committed robbery by taking away a Bolero Pickup vehicle bearing registration number UP50DT2408, which was loaded with 12 quintals of chickens. Learned counsel for applicant submits that the applicant is not named in the First Information Report. No specific allegation has been leveled against him. During investigation his name has been surfaced. The co-accused Punit Jaiswal @ Puneet Kumar Jaiswal vs. State of U.P. and another has been granted anticipatory bail by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 22.5.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 482 BNSS No.504 of 2025. The applicant has explained the criminal history of one case in the supplementary affidavit. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer, however, could not dispute the aforesaid facts. On due consideration to the submissions advanced, perusal of the record as also the fact that the applicant is languishing in jail since 27.3.2025, he is not named in the First Information Report, he has explained the criminal history, the co- accused has been granted anticipatory bail and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case I find it to be a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant Jeeva Saroj @ Aman Saroj be released on bail in aforesaid case crime number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court concerned with the following conditions: (i) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial. (ii) The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. (iii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (iv) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (v) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code. (vi) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code. Order Date :- 3.6.2025 Madhu D.R/P.S Digitally signed by :- MADHU KUMARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench