Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 141801 (PNJ)

RAGHBIR AND OTHERS v. COMMISSIONER, ROHTAK DIVISION, ROHTAK AND OTHERS

CWP/23174/2025 · 2025-11-18

Deepak Sibal, Lapita Banerji

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Raghbir and others Commissioner, Rohtak Division, Rohtak and others CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. B.S Mr. Nayandeep Rana, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Pardeep K.Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.4 and 5 (iii) and (iv). DEEPAK SIBAL Learned this petition with liberty to the petitioners to revision available to them under Section Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, as applicable to Haryana. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. November 18 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable Sr. No.126 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-23174 Date of Decision : Raghbir and others Versus Commissioner, Rohtak Division, Rohtak and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. B.S.Rana, Senior Advocate with Mr. Nayandeep Rana, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Pardeep K.Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.4 and 5 (iii) and (iv). *** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner this petition with liberty to the petitioners to revision available to them under Section 13 Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, as applicable to Haryana. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (DEEPAK SIBAL JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE 8, 2025 ther speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 23174-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 18.11.2025 …Petitioners Commissioner, Rohtak Division, Rohtak and others …Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI .Rana, Senior Advocate with Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Pardeep K.Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.4 and 5 (iii) and (iv). enior counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioners to avail of their remedy of 3-AA of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, as applicable to Haryana. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2025.11.21 09:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document