Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 141788 (ALL)

VIJAY KUMAR SINSH v. SRI BHAWANI SINGH KANGAROT, DIRECTOR, MADHYANCHAL VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM, LKO. AND OTHERS

CAPL/2393/2024 · 2025-04-03

Rajeev Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18632 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2393 of 2024 Applicant :- Vijay Kumar Singh Opposite Party :- Sri Bhawani Singh Kangarot, Director, Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam, Lko. And Others Counsel for Applicant :- Abhishek Khare,Anita Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J. 1. Heard. 2. The instant contempt application has been filed by the applicant alleging disobedience of the order dated 31.01.2023 passed in Writ-A No. 764 of 2023. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that twice, name of the applicant was forwarded for promotion, but the same was not considered despite the directions of this Court passed on 31.01.2023, therefore, the respondents may be summoned and punished accordingly. 4. It is evident from the record that vide order dated 17.06.2022 passed by Executive Engineer, direction was issued for recovery of sum of Rs. 1,78,713/- and censure entry along with stoppage of two increment with cumulative effect. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant concedes the fact that sum of Rs. 1,78,713/- has already been received in pursuance of the interim order of this Court dated 31.01.2023. 6. It is also evident that there is no such order passed by the writ Court for considering the promotion of the applicant. In such circumstances, this Court is of the view that no contempt is made out. Accordingly, the contempt application is misconceived and the same is dismissed. Order Date :- 3.4.2025 Arpan Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench