Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 141737 (ALL)

NANDINI TIWARI v. DEEPIKA SINGH, CIVIL JUDGE , F.T.C./A.C.J.M. DISTT. FAIZABAD

CAPL/1685/2025 · 2025-07-10

Rajeev Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:39527 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1685 of 2025 Applicant :- Nandini Tiwari Opposite Party :- Deepika Singh, Civil Judge , F.T.C./A.C.J.M. Distt. Faizabad Counsel for Applicant :- Om Prakash Srivastava,Atul Kumar Srivastava,Imtishal Shah Counsel for Opposite Party :- Gaurav Mehrotra Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Devam Shukla, Advocate holding brief of Sri Gaurav Mehrotra, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that proceeding under Section 12 of Domestic Violence Act, 2005 being Complaint No.1259 of 2022 (Nandini Tiwari Vs. Sourabh Tiwari and others) was not being decided by the competent court therefore application under Section 483 No.315 of 2024 was filed before this Court with the prayer that the competent court may be directed to decide the aforesaid case. The aforesaid application was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 23.07.2024 with a direction to the Presiding Officer of the court concerned to conclude the proceeding of case in question as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four months from the date of production of the order. He further submits that the order of this Court was served but, till today, as the proceeding was not concluded then the present contempt application has been preferred. He further submitted that as the respondent violated the direction of this Court therefore, appropriate proceeding may be drawn against the Presiding Officer. 3. Sri Devam Shukla, Advocate holding brief of Sri Gaurav Mehrotra, learned Special Counsel for High Court informed the Court that the aforesaid case is listed tomorrow in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Court No.3, Ayodhya and the proceedings is going on without giving any unnecessary adjournments and the same can be concluded expeditiously. 4. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, this contempt application is hereby disposed of finally with a direction to the Presiding Officer of the court concerned to decide the case in question in terms of the direction issued by this Court vide order dated 23.07.2024 passed in application under Section 483 No.315 of 2024. Order Date :- 10.7.2025. Rks. Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench