RUTH YVONNE URSULA GOMEZ v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
I.A.(Civil)/1935/2025 · 2025-06-17
Arun Dev Choudhury
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14172 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14172 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/6 GAHC010127172025
2025:GAU-AS:8073
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1935/2025 RUTH YVONNE URSULA GOMEZ SECRETARY , PASTORATE COMMITTEE OF THE CHRIST CHURCH, GUWAHATI, PANBAZAR, GUWAHATI-01, W/O- LATE WINSTON GOMEZ, R/O- H.NO-10, SRI KRISHNA PATH, JANAKPUR SOUTH , KAHILIPARA, GUWAHATI-781019 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS REP. BY THE SECRETARY , MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, 101-A, SOUTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-11 2:INDIAN CHURCH TRUSTEES BISHOPS HOUSE 51 CHOWRINGEE ROAD KOLKATA WEST BENGAL-700071 3:THE BISHOP OF CALCUTTA INDIAN CHURCH TRUSTEES BISHOPS HOUSE
51 CHOWRINGEE ROAD KOLKATA WEST BENGAL-700071 4:CHURCH OF NORTH INDIA CNI BHAWAN 16 PANTH MARG NEW DELHI-01
Page No.# 2/6 5:MODERATOR CHURCH OF NORTH INDIA CNI BHAWAN 16 PANTH MARG NEW DELHI-01 6:DIOCESE OF NORTH EAST INDIA M.G ROAD SHILLONG PIN-7893001 7:MICHAEL HERENZ BISHOP OF THE DIOCESE OF NORTH EAST INDIA
M.G ROAD SHILLONG PIN-7893001 8:NORTH EAST INDIA DIOCESAN TRUST ASSOCIATION REP. BY THE SECRETARY BISHOPS HOUSE
M.G ROAD SHILLONG PIN-7893001 9:HARRISON MASIH PRESBYTER IN CHARGE CHRIST CHURCH CHURCH FIELD PAN BAZAR GUWAHATI-01 10:JONATHAN GIRI THE DIOCESAN SECRETARY
DIOCESE OF NORTH EAST INDIA BISHOPS KUTI SHILLONG
PIN-793001 11:THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE PANBAZAR GUWAHATI-0
Page No.# 3/6 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR B D DAS, MR H K SARMA,MR. P BHOWMICK,MR J LOTHA Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., GA, ASSAM,MR. R BORUAH (R-6 TO 10),MR. A R BHUYAN (R4, R-5),MR N Z CHOUDHURY(R4, R-5),MR N A MAZARBHUIYA(R4, R-5) Linked Case : WP(C)/4809/2024 RUTH YVONNE URSULA GOMEZ SECRETARY
PASTORATE COMMITTEE OF THE CHRIST CHURCH GUWAHATI PANBAZAR GUWAHATI-01
W/O- LATE WINSTON GOMEZ
R/O- H.NO-10 SRI KRISHNA PATH JANAKPUR SOUTH KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-781019 VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND 10 ORS REP. BY THE SECRETARY
MINISTRY OF DEFENCE
101-A SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI-11 2:INDIAN CHURCH TRUSTEES BISHOPS HOUSE 51 CHOWRINGEE ROAD KOLKATA WEST BENGAL-700071 3:THE BISHOP OF CALCUTTA
Page No.# 4/6 INDIAN CHURCH TRUSTEES BISHOPS HOUSE
51 CHOWRINGEE ROAD KOLKATA WEST BENGAL-700071 4:CHURCH OF NORTH INDIA CNI BHAWAN 16 PANTH MARG NEW DELHI-01 5:MODERATOR CHURCH OF NORTH INDIA CNI BHAWAN 16 PANTH MARG NEW DELHI-01 6:DIOCESE OF NORTH EAST INDIA M.G ROAD SHILLONG PIN-7893001 7:MICHAEL HERENZ BISHOP OF THE DIOCESE OF NORTH EAST INDIA
M.G ROAD SHILLONG PIN-7893001 8:NORTH EAST INDIA DIOCESAN TRUST ASSOCIATION REP.
BY THE SECRETARY BISHOPS HOUSE
M.G ROAD SHILLONG PIN-7893001 9:HARRISON MASIH PRESBYTER IN CHARGE CHRIST CHURCH CHURCH FIELD PAN BAZAR GUWAHATI-01 10:JONATHAN GIRI
Page No.# 5/6 THE DIOCESAN SECRETARY
DIOCESE OF NORTH EAST INDIA BISHOPS KUTI SHILLONG
PIN-793001 11:THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE PANBAZAR GUWAHATI-01 ------------ Advocate for : MR B D DAS Advocate for : DY.S.G.I. appearing for UNION OF INDIA AND 10 ORS
BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY O R D E R
18.06.2025
1. Heard Mr. BD Das, learned Senior counsel for the applicant. 2. This is an application filed for typographical correction in the order dated 03.06.2025 passed by this court in WP(C) No. 4809/2024. 3. According to the learned counsel for the applicant, in the aforesaid order at paragraph No. 8, a typographical error has been occurred that Mr. Das, the learned Senior counsel had submitted that the petitioner had preferred a representation before the respondent No. 3 who is the Court of SYNOD inasmuch as the words “Court of SYNOD” ought to have been “Bishop of Calcutta.”
4. Perused the application along with the order dated 03.06.2025. 5. Accordingly, the words “Court of SYNOD” is corrected by replacing the words “Bishop of Calcutta” and the sentence be read as “Mr. Das, the learned
Page No.# 6/6 Senior counsel had submitted that the petitioner had preferred a representation before the respondent No. 3 who is the Bishop of Calcutta”. 6. Accordingly, IA stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant