Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Court No. - 78 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13619 of 2021 Applicant :- Shiv Kumar Alias Pappu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Atul Shukla,Radhey Shyam Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
1. List revised. 2. No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this bail application despite the fact that there are two learned counsels appearing in the matter. Sri Ram Prakash Shukla, learned counsel for the State is present. 3. This is third bail application of the applicant. The first bail application of the applicant was rejected by Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. vide order dated 23.01.2019 passed in Crl. Misc. Bail Application No. 3298 of 2019 (Shiv Kumar @ Pappu Vs. State of U.P.). The second bail application of the applicant was rejected by this Court vide order dated 22.01.2021 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 18801 of 2019 (Shiv Kumar @ Pappu vs. State of U.P.). 4. Even previously on 24.03.2021 there was no representation from either sides of the parties and the following order was passed:-
"Case taken up in the revised list. The matter is listed in the fresh supplementary list today in compliance of the order dated
04.03.2021. This is the third bail application. The first bail application of the applicant was rejected by Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh, J. vide order dated 23.01.2018 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 3298 of 2019 (Shiv Kumar @ Pappu Vs. State of U.P.) The second bail application of the applicant was rejected by this Court vide order dated 22.01.2021 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 18801 of 2019. No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this bail application. Sri Sanjay Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State is present. The matter is adjourned."
5. The present matter is of the year 2018. It is more than six years since then. It appears that learned counsel for the applicant is not interested in pursuing the matter as or the matter has rendered infructuous by efflux of time. 6. Despite the matter being taken up in the revised list, there is no representation from the side of the applicant. 7. In view of the above, the present bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 23.1.2025 AS Rathore Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK SINGH RATHOR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK SINGH RATHOR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad