SANA FARID v. T.K.SHARMA,DIRECTOR EDUCATION AND ORS.
CPSW/184/2014 · 2025-12-19
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14170 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14170 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 27
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case : CPSW No. 184/2014 in SWP No. 603/2014
Sana Farid …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through: None. V/s
T.K.Sharma and others ... Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Saliqa Sheikh, Assisting Counsel to Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG.
CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
ORDER 19.12.2025
The petitioner prays for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for their willful defiance of Judgment dated March 07, 2014 passed by the Writ Court in SWP No. 603/2014 (Sana Farid Vs. State of J&K & Ors). Vide order, referred to above, the Writ Court had disposed of the petition, preferred by the petitioner, with a direction to the respondents to consider and take decision on his representation within a specified time. And, status quo with regard to the selection process was ordered to be maintained for a period of one week.
Learned counsel for the respondents, at the outset, has drawn the attention of the Court to the compliance report filed on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 to 3. And, with reference to the averments set out in Para 7 thereof, she submits that since the claim of the petitioner was not covered under Government
Order No. 919-Edu of 2018 dated November 16, 2018, the same was rejected by a speaking order dated July 30, 2019 passed by the Chief Education Officer, Kishtwar. That being so, nothing substantive survives in the petition and the same is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
(
(ARUN PALLI)
CHIEF JUSTICE Jammu : 19.12.2025 Pawan Chopra/Secy
Pawan Chopra 2025.12.20 05:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document