MAJIBAR RAHMAN AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS
WP(C)/3282/2024 · 2025-04-27
Manish Choudhury
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14168 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14168 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010127142024
2025:GAU-AS:5116
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3282/2024 MAJIBAR RAHMAN AND ANR S/O- LATE KUDRAT ALI, RESIDENT OF - VILL- SHIMOLABARI PT-I, P.O.- RANGAPANI, P.S.- MERERCHAR, DISTRICT- BONGAIGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 783384.
2: ARFAN ALI S/O- LATE SAYED ALI
RESIDENT OF VILL- NARARBITA PT-III
P.O.- RANGAPANI
P.S.- MERERCHAR
DISTRICT- BONGAIGAON ASSAM
PIN- 783384 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.
OF ASSAM, COOPERATION DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6.
2:THE REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES ASSAM KHANAPARA GUWAHATI-22.
Page No.# 2/3 3:THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES ASSAM KHANAPARA GUWAHATI-22.
4:THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES NORTH SALMARA P.O.- ABHAYAPURI
DISTRICT- BONGAIGAON ASSAM
PIN- 783382.
5:THE DISTRICT DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES GOALPARA AND I/C ASSTT. REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES NORTH SALMARA
ABHAYAPURI
DISTRICT- BONGAIGAON ASSAM
PIN- 783382.
6:ONE-MAN COMMITTEE/ RETURNING OFFICER ( GOVT. OFFICER ON MANAGEMENT) RANGAPANI NO. 1 SAMABAY SAMITY LTD.
ABHAYAPURI BONGAIGAON ASSAM
PIN- 781319.
7:THE SECRETARY RANGAPANI NO. 1 SAMABAY SAMITY LTD. ABHAYAPURI BONGAIGAON
ASSAM PIN- 781319 Advocate for the Petitioner : DR. B AHMED, MR M HUSSAIN,MR. A K AZAD,MR K UDDIN,MR. N HAQUE Advocate for the Respondent : SC, CO OP,
Page No.# 3/3
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER 28.04.2025
Mr. A.K. Azad, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the subject-matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Ms. P. Upadhyay, learned counsel representing Mr. S.K. Talukdar, learned Standing Counsel, Cooperation Department is in attendance. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Azad, learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant