Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14168 (GAU)

MAJIBAR RAHMAN AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS

WP(C)/3282/2024 · 2025-04-27

Manish Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010127142024 2025:GAU-AS:5116 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3282/2024 MAJIBAR RAHMAN AND ANR S/O- LATE KUDRAT ALI, RESIDENT OF - VILL- SHIMOLABARI PT-I, P.O.- RANGAPANI, P.S.- MERERCHAR, DISTRICT- BONGAIGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 783384. 2: ARFAN ALI S/O- LATE SAYED ALI RESIDENT OF VILL- NARARBITA PT-III P.O.- RANGAPANI P.S.- MERERCHAR DISTRICT- BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN- 783384 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, COOPERATION DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6. 2:THE REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES ASSAM KHANAPARA GUWAHATI-22. Page No.# 2/3 3:THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES ASSAM KHANAPARA GUWAHATI-22. 4:THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES NORTH SALMARA P.O.- ABHAYAPURI DISTRICT- BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN- 783382. 5:THE DISTRICT DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES GOALPARA AND I/C ASSTT. REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES NORTH SALMARA ABHAYAPURI DISTRICT- BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN- 783382. 6:ONE-MAN COMMITTEE/ RETURNING OFFICER ( GOVT. OFFICER ON MANAGEMENT) RANGAPANI NO. 1 SAMABAY SAMITY LTD. ABHAYAPURI BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN- 781319. 7:THE SECRETARY RANGAPANI NO. 1 SAMABAY SAMITY LTD. ABHAYAPURI BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN- 781319 Advocate for the Petitioner : DR. B AHMED, MR M HUSSAIN,MR. A K AZAD,MR K UDDIN,MR. N HAQUE Advocate for the Respondent : SC, CO OP, Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER 28.04.2025 Mr. A.K. Azad, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the subject-matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Ms. P. Upadhyay, learned counsel representing Mr. S.K. Talukdar, learned Standing Counsel, Cooperation Department is in attendance. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Azad, learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant