Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 141634 (ALL)

ANUJ @ CHHOTU THRU. HIS FATHER KESHAV LOHAR v. STATE OF U.P. and ANOTHER

CRLRD/805/2017 · 2025-08-29

Saurabh Lavania

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 805 of 2017 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Case called out. No one appeared on behalf of the revisionist to press this revision. However, Sri Aajy Kumar Srivastava, learned AGA is present in the Court. 2. This criminal revision seeking bail has been filed under Section 102 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (in short "Act of 2000") against the order dated 07.03.2017, passed by the Sessions Judge, Sitapur, in Criminal Appeal No.70 of 2016, which was preferred against the order dated 14.09.2016, passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Sitapur in Bail Application arising out of Case Crime No.216 of 2015, under Sections- 302, 201, 376, 511 I.P.C., Section 3(2)(5) of SC/ST Act & Section 7/8 of POCSO Act, Police Station- Reusa, District- Sitapur. 3. This Court vide order dated 26.08.2025, after taking note of the fact that the instant revision relates to enlargement of revisionist on bail, directed the Senior Registrar of this Court to provide the status of the present case. 4. In compliance of this Court's order dated 26.08.2025, District Judge, Sitapur has sent copy of report dated 28.08.2025 of Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Sitapur (in short "Magistrate"). Relevant portion of the report dated 28.08.2025 reads as under:- "ससम्मान िनवेदन है िक माननीय उच्च न्यायालय इलाहाबाद, खण्डपीठ लखनऊ द्वारा िक्रिमनल िर०िड० नं0-805/2017 के सन्दभर् में बोडर् के समक्ष िवचाराधीन मु0अ0सं0- 216/2015, उ0प्र0 राज्य बनाम अनुज उफर् छोटू, अन्तगर्त धारा-302,201,376,511 भा०दं०सं० व धारा-3(2) () एस0सी0/एस0टी0 ऐक्ट तथा धारा-7/8 पी0ओ0सी0एस0ओ0 ऐक्ट के सन्दभर् में अद्यतन आख्या आहूत की गयी है। Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Sushil Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Govt. Advocate Anuj @ Chhotu Thru. His Father Keshav Lohar .....Revisionist(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) सादर िनवेदन है िक कायार्लय आख्यानुसार मु0अ0सं0-216/2015, उ0प्र0 राज्य बनाम अनुज उफर् छोटू, अन्तगर्त धारा-302,201,376,511 भा0दं०सं० व धारा-3(2)() एस0सी0 एस0टी0 ऐक्ट तथा धारा-7/8 पी0ओ0सी0एस0ओ0 ऐक्ट का मामला बोडर् द्वारा िदनांक- 28.09.2018 को िनणीर्त (दोषमुक्त) िकया जा चुका है। आख्या माननीय महोदय की सेवा में सादर अवलोकनाथर् प्रेिषत है।" 5. Taking note of the above quoted report of the Magistrate dated 28.08.2025, the instant revision is dismissed as having become infructuous. August 29, 2025 Mohit Singh/- CRLRD No. 805 of 2017 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench