Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14159 (RAJ)

BHAGOTI DEVI MEENA v. STATE OF RAJ AND ORS

CW/9567/2010 · 2025-01-22

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:3202] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9567/2010 Hkkxksrh nsoh eh.kk ifRu Lo- Jh Hkokuhjke eh.kk iq= Jh jkenso eh.kk fuoklh xzke [kksjk eh.kk] rglhy vkesj ftyk t;iqjA izkFkhZ ;kph cuke 1- jktLFkku ljdkj] tfj;s eq[; lfpo] lfpoky;] lh Ldhe] t;iqj] jktLFkkuA 2- lfpo] lkoZtfud fuekZ.k foHkkx] jktLFkku ljdkj] lfpoky;] t;iqj] jktLFkkuA 3- vf/k”kk’kh vfHk;ark] lk-fu-fo- [k.M izFke] t;iqj] gluiqjk vtesj jksM] t;iqjA 4- lgk;d vfHk;ark] lk-fu-fo- uxj mi[k.M izFke] t;iqj] gluiqjk vtesj jksM] t;iqjA foi{khx.k For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sharad Joshi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 22/01/2025 Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that as on date, whereabouts of the petitioner are not known. It is further submitted that petitioners’ son has been granted compassionate appointment. Further, retiral dues as claimed in the petition are not due for the reason that the petitioner is not eligible to claim the same. Upon perusal of the Court file, this Court has noted that no sincere efforts have been made by the petitioner to contest the matter. [2025:RJ-JP:3202] (2 of 2) [CW-9567/2010] Today, when the matter was called for hearing, none marked presence qua the petitioner. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed in default, with liberty to revive the same upon subsequent developments. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/146