Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14157 (GAU)

M/S PADMAVATI CONSTGRUCTION v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS

WP(C)/4844/2014 · 2025-06-04

Arun Dev Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010126972014 2025:GAU-AS:7384 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4844/2014 M/S PADMAVATI CONSTGRUCTION REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI AJIT KR. JAIN KRISHNA RICE MILL BUILDING, 3RD FLOOR, PAGLASTHAN BONGAIGAON- 783380. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SPECIAL SECRETARY, TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING and N.H. DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6. 2:MISSION DIRECTOR NATIONAL RURAL HEALTH MISSION NRHM KHANAPAA GUWAHATI-22 ASSAM. 3:DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CUM CHAIRMAN DHS DIST. BANGAIGAON ASSAM. 4:THE CHIEF ENGINEER P.W.D. BUILDING CHANDMARI GUWAHATI-3 ASSAM. 5:EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWD GOALPARA BLDG. DIVISION GOALPARA Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.G GOSWAMI, MR.S SARMA,MSB DEVI Advocate for the Respondent : MR.J U N M LASKAR, MR. B GOGOI Add. Adv. General,MR.J M A CHOUDHURY(SC, NRHM),SC, HEALTH,GA, ASSAM,SC, PWD,MR.P NAYAK,MR.Y S MANNAN BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY ORDER 05-06-2025 1. Heard Mr. S. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Gogoi, learned Additional Advocate General, Assam for the respondents. 2. It is jointly submitted by the learned counsels for the parties that in the meeting held on 05.05.2025 between the National Health Mission and the Public Works Department relating to the claim of the petitioner, the dispute was resolved. In terms of paragraph 4 of the said minutes of the meeting dated 05.05.2025, the payment due to the petitioner shall be processed with due approval of the Government but without interest. 3. Mr. S. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a direction may be issued to the respondents to complete the aforesaid exercise within a specific period of time, inasmuch as, interest is also not paid to the petitioner. 4. Considering the settlement of the dispute, it is provided that admitted amount be paid to the petitioner within a period of 6 (six) months from the date of this order. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. 6. Copies of the instruction including the minutes of the meeting dated 05.05.2025 furnished by Mr. B. Gogoi, learned Additional Advocate General, Assam, be kept on record. JUDGE Page No.# 3/3 Comparing Assistant