RAM JANAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. SECONDARY EDUCATION U.P. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIA/5844/2025 · 2025-05-30
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 141553 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 141553 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:33482 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5844 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Janam Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Secondary Education U.P. Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anjani Kumar Dvivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
1. Heard Shri Anjani Kumar Dwivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Pankaj Patel, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for opposite parties No. 1 to 5. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to opposite party No.6 is hereby dispensed with. 3. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-
"(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to pay the arrears of salary of the petitioner for 01-10-2010 to 27-12-2011 which is pending before opposite party no. 4 since 26-11-2014 contained Annexure no. 6 to this writ petition. (ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the opposite parties to take the decision on the representation of petitioner dated 13-09-2024 regarding payment of arrears of salary of the petitioner for the time period 01-10-2010 to 27-12-2011 contained as annexure no. 7 to this writ petition in the interest of justice. "
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of his grievance, the petitioner has preferred representation dated 1309.2024 (Annexure No.7) to the competent authority but to no avail. He has further submitted that the petitioner is ready to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority, therefore, he may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.4 i.e., District Inspector of Schools, Sultanpur District Sultanpur and a direction may be issued to him to consider and decide the said representation of the petitioner with expedition. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection if direction for disposal of the said representation is issued. 5.
Therefore, in view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby dispose of this petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.4 i.e., District Inspector of Schools, Sultanpur, District Sultanpur ventilating his grievance taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him enclosing therewith the copy of his earlier representation, if any, which are necessary for disposal of the representation within a period of fifteen days from today and if such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the same strictly, by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if it is so required, with expedition preferably, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. 6. This writ petition is disposed of, in view of the aforesaid terms Order Date :- 30.5.2025 Reena/- (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- REENA KANNAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench