RAJU @ BALKNSHNA @ BALAKRISHNA AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/4436/2025 · 2025-07-03
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 141517 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 141517 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:37811 Court No. - 15 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4436 of 2025 Applicant :- Raju @ Balknshna @ Balakrishna And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Suhail Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Mohammad Alishah Faruqi Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard Sri Mohd. Suhail, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Ashok Kumar Srivastava, the learned A.G.A for the State and Sri Mohammad Alishah Faruqi, the learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2. 2. The instant application has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C, the applicant has sought quashing of the charge sheet dated 29.06.2014, summoning order dated 02.02.2016 as well as the entire proceedings of Case No. 460 of 2016 arising out of Case Crime No. 430A of 2014, under Sections 323, 325, 504 I.P.C, Police Station Mohanganj, District Amethi, which is pending before the court of Special Judge, SC/ST Act, District- Raebareli on the basis of compromise entered into between the parties. 3. The quashing of the proceedings has been sought on the ground that the parties have entered into a compromise on 13.05.2025., a copy whereof has been annexed with the affidavit. 4. On 27.05.2025, this Court has directed the trial court to verify the compromise. The compromise has been verified by means of an order dated 11.06.2025 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST Act, District- Raebareli. It is stated in the compromise that the parties are related to each other and the F.I.R was lodged because of some property dispute, which has been resolved and the opposite party no.2 does not want any
further proceedings against the applicant. 5. The learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 2 has supported the prayer made by the applicant and has given his consent for proceedings being quashed on the basis of compromise. 6. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and the charge sheet dated 29.06.2014, summoning order dated 02.02.2016 as well as the entire proceedings of Case No. 460 of 2016 arising out of Case Crime No. 430A of 2014, under Sections 323, 325, 504 I.P.C, Police Station Mohanganj, District Amethi, which is pending before the court of Special Judge, SC/ST Act, District- Raebareli are hereby quashed. .
(Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Order Date :- 3.7.2025 -Amit K- Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench