[2025:RJ-JP:15099] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 933/2010 1. Satish Bakliwal S/o Shri Tara Chand Bakliwal, aged about 56 years, resident of Plot No.B-103(A), University Marg, Bapu Nagar, Jaipur 2. Smt. Santosh Agarwal W/o Shri V.N. Agarwal, aged about 63 years, resident of House No.31/232, Sector 3, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur 3. Smt. Shashi Khosla W/o Shri Kamal Khosla, aged about 55 years, resident of Plot No.75, Vishwakarma Nagar, Maharani Farm, Durgapura, Jaipur 4. Smt. Sucheta Agarwal W/o Shri Purushotam Agarwal, aged about 43 years, Plot No.182, Barkat Nagar, Tonk Phatak, Jaipur 5. Smt. Santosh Goswami W/o Late Shri R.S. Joshi, aged about 65 years, resident of Plot No.22, Greater Kailash, Lalkothi, Jaipur ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Principal Secretary, Department of Co-Operative, Govt. of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Jaipur Division, Jaipur, Room No.203, Mini Secretariat, Bani Park, Jaipur 3. Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Jaipur City, Jaipur Room No.605, Mini Secretariat, Bani Park, Jaipur 4. Administrator & Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Jaipur Rural, Room No.608, Vth Floor, Mini Secretariat, Jaipur 5. Indira Nagar Grah Nirman Sahakari Samiti Limited through its Secretary Mahinder Singh Gaur, D-13, Jyotiba Phule Road, Opposite Hanuman Temple, Govindpuri, Sodala, Jaipur, Second Address : 14, Telephone Colony, Tonk Phatak, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sarthak Rastogi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sagar Jindal for Mr. Padam Singh Gurjar, AGC Mr. Vikas Saini HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 03/04/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:15099] (2 of 2) [CW-933/2010] Learned counsel for the respondents No.1 to 4 submits that this civil writ petition is rendered infructuous inasmuch as the respondent No.5-Society has gone in liquidation and the order impugned in the writ petition is rendered inoperative and inexecutable. In view of the aforesaid statement, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press this civil writ petition at this stage with liberty to get it revived if the need so arises. The prayer is not opposed by the learned counsel for the respondents. In view thereof, this civil writ petition is disposed of as not pressed with liberty as aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/140