LALU RAM SHUKLA AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/516/2025 · 2025-06-02
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 141466 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 141466 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34228 Court No. - 3 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 516 of 2025 Applicant :- Lalu Ram Shukla And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Girdhari Lal Shukla,Satyendra Nath Gautam,Seeta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for applicants as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State.
Learned counsel for applicants, after arguing for some time, submits that the present application may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid down by Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Cri) No.5191 of 2021, to which learned A.G.A. has no objection. In view of the above, prayer for quashing the impugned proceeding is refused. So far as other prayer is concerned, it is provided that in case the applicants appear before the trial court within two weeks' from today and apply for bail, the same shall be decided expeditiously by the learned trial court, in view of the law laid down by Supreme Court in the cases of Satender Kumar Antil's (supra). Thereafter, it would be open for the applicants to file an application for discharge which application would be considered in accordance with law by the learned trial court. The application is disposed of accordingly.
Order Date :- 2.6.2025 prateek Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench