Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 141461 (ALL)

IMAM HASAN ANSARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO

BAIL/4541/2025 · 2025-09-04

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4541 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Om Prakash Srivastava, the learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Jayant Singh Tomar, the learned A.G.A.-I for the State and Sri Mohammad Kashif, the learned counsel for the complainant. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 0313 of 2024, under Sections 419 420, 467, 468, 471, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., registered at Police Station Jankipuram, District Lucknow. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of F.I.R. lodged on 07.10.2024 against the applicant and another accused person Mukesh Kumar, stating that the complainant fraudulently kept a QR code of his bank account on the petrol pump of the complainant in connivance Mukesh Kumar, who is manager of the petrol pump and he fraudulently got payment of Rs.17,35,000/- transferred to his bank account. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is a 65 years old person having no criminal history and he has been falsely implicated in the present case . 5. A short counter affidavit has been filed by the learned counsel for the complainant, wherein he has stated that the applicant has refunded the entire amount to the complainant and the parties have entered into a settlement. 6. The State has filed a counter affidavit annexing therewith copies of material collected during investigation and a copy of the compromise. 7. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 8. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Om Prakash Srivastava, Atul Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Abdul Haleem, Ashid Ali, Mohammad Kashif Imam Hasan Ansari .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s) 9. Let the applicant- Imam Hasan Ansari be released on bail in aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to the following conditions: - (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. September 4, 2025 Preeti. BAIL No. 4541 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench