HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6135/2008 Ram Gopal Bohra, S/o Shri Ramji Lal, Village And Post Gudhachandraji, Tehsil Nadoti, District Karauli. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Chairman, Khadi Bhandar, Udyog Mandir, Amer, Jaipur. 2. Mantri, Gram Seva Mandal Certified By Khadi Gramodhyog Commission And Registered By Government, Karauli. 3. Vyavasthapak, Khadi Ashram, Gangapurcity, District Karauli. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Pathak For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sanjay Joshi JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 17/03/2025 1. By way of filing of this writ petition, a prayer has been made for issuing directions to the respondents to correct the date of birth of the petitioner in his service record. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the correct date of birth of the petitioner is 20.07.1949 as per the school certificate but the same has been recorded as 17.06.1948. Learned counsel submits that looking to the academic record of the petitioner, appropriate directions be issued to the authority concerned, to do needful correction. 3. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on the record. (2 of 2) [CW-6135/2008] 4. Perusal of the record indicates that an application with regard to Provident Fund was signed in the handwriting of the person none other than the petitioner himself, wherein he has mentioned his date of birth i.e., 17.06.1948 and on the basis of the aforesaid, the petitioner continued in service and stood retired after attaining the age of superannuation. After the retirement of the petitioner, the petitioner became prudent and approached the authority concerned for doing the needful correction. 5. In the considered opinion of this Court, the disputed question of fact, with regard to the correct birth date of the petitioner is involved in this petition, which cannot be adjudicated by this Court under its writ jurisdiction contained under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and on this count alone, the instant writ petition is liable to be and is hereby rejected. 6. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to avail the other remedies available to him under the law. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/84