SUMIT v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
CRLRD/260/2025 · 2025-07-15
Rajnish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 141428 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 141428 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Court No. - 12 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 260 of 2025 Revisionist :- Sumit Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- S.C. Misra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Jayveer Rajput Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J. Case called out. Learned counsel for the respondent no.2 and respondent no.2 are present in person. However, neither the revisionist is present nor his counsel is present. As per office report, the revisionist has not deposited Rs.75,000/- as directed by this Court by means of the order dated 28.05.2025. In view of above, it appears that the revisionist is not interested in pursuing the matter, therefore, the application for condonation of delay (C.M.Application No.2 of 2025) is dismissed for want of prosecution. Consequently, the revision is dismissed. Order Date :- 15.7.2025 Akanksha Sri/- Digitally signed by :- AKANKSHA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- AKANKSHA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench