KM. ARCHANA DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. PANCHAYTI RAJ U.P. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/5682/2025 · 2025-05-30
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 141401 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 141401 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:33456 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5682 of 2025 Petitioner :- Km. Archana Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Panchayti Raj U.P. Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Virendra Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-
"(a) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party No.2 to appoint the petitioner on the post of Panchayat Assistant /Account-cum-Data Entry Operator in Village Panchayat-Shahpur, Pargana-Aldemau, Tehsil-Kadipur, District- Sultanpur in pursuance of the proposal dated 31.08.2021, as contained in Annexure No.1 to this writ petition, in the interest of justice."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of her grievance, the petitioner has preferred a representation dated 10.01.2025 to the opposite party No.2, but no decision has been taken on the same till date. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner is ready to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority, therefore, she may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority and direction may be issued him/her to consider and decide the said representation within a stipulated time. 5. Learned counsel for the opposite parties has no objection if direction is issued to the Competent Authority to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner within a stipulated time. 6.
In view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, the instant writ petition is being disposed of finally at the admission stage permitting the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.2 i.e. the District Magistrate, Sultanpur taking all pleas and grounds which are available with her annexing therewith copy of her earlier representation, if any, and the relevant documents in support of
her claim within a period of fifteen days from today, and if any such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, strictly in accordance with law by passing a speaking and reasoned order, with expedition preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order along with representation and the decision thereof be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. 7. In view of the aforesaid terms, the instant writ petition is
disposed of finally. . [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.]
Order Date :- 30.5.2025 Suresh/ Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench