Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14140 (ALL)

MOHAMMAD FARAHIM ALIAS FAHEEM ALIAS FARAHIM v. STATE OF U.P.

ABAIL/987/2025 · 2025-05-11

Siddharth

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:77302 Court No. - 47 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 987 of 2025 Applicant :- Mohammad Farahim Alias Faheem Alias Farahim Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Devesh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Siddharth,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State. The instant Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed with a prayer to grant an anticipatory bail to the applicant, namely, Mohammad Farahim Alias Faheem Alias Farahim, in Case Crime No.- 0331 of 2020, under Section-506, 504, 336, 307, 353, 332, 149, 148, 147 I.P.C and 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station- Khair, District- Aligarh. There are serious allegations of making attempt on life of police party against the applicant in the first information report. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the applicants. He has submitted that in view of the seriousness of the allegations made against the applicant, he is not entitled to grant of anticipatory bail. The apprehension of the applicant is not founded on any material on record. Only on the basis of imaginary fear, anticipatory bail cannot be granted. After hearing rival contentions, this court finds that from the material collected by the investigation officer, it cannot be said that the offence against the applicant is not made out. It is not a fit case for granting anticipatory bail. Application is accordingly rejected. However on the request of learned counsel for the applicant, it is directed that the in case applicant appears and surrenders before the court below within 60 days from today and applying for regular bail, his bail application shall be considered as per judgment and order of Apex Court in the of Satendra Kumar Antil vs. C.B.I., passed in S.L.P (Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021. For a period of one month he shall not be arrested in the aforesaid case, if not already arrested. However, in case, the applicant does not appears before the court below within the aforesaid period, coercive action shall be taken against him. It is made clear that the applicant will not be granted any further time by this court for surrendering before the court below as directed above. Order Date :- 12.5.2025 SS Digitally signed by :- SURENDER SINGH NARANG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad