GANGIREADLLA SIVASWAMY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/8899/2025 · 2025-04-04
Sumathi Jagadam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14135 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14135 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010173522025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 8899/2025 Between: Gangireadlla Sivaswamy and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following ORDER:
The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief:
“…to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents in not considering the application of the Petitioners dt 19- 03-2025 for release of the vehicles bearing Nos. 1) A.P.39VB3798 (Ashok Leyland Lorry) and 2) A.P.39WA9387 (Intra V50 Gold LX- Tata Van) seized in F.I.R.No.49 of 2025, dt07-02-2025 on the file of Dwaraka Tirumala P.S, Eluru District pending disposal of the proceedings under A.P.E.C. Act and PDS Rules as arbitrary, illegal and
violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 16 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to release the subject vehicles for interim custody on the application of the Petitioners dt.19- 03-2025 and pass …”
2. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a representation was made before the 3rd respondent/Joint Collector on 19.03.2025 with regard to release of vehicles and the same may be disposed of by fixing time.
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents has consented for the same.
4. Having considered the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, without going into the merits of the case, the Writ Petition is
disposed of by directing the petitioner to file appropriate application before the 3rd respondent within one (1) week from the date of receipt of a copy of this
order. On receipt of such application, the 3rd respondent shall consider and pass appropriate orders by giving reasonable opportunity to the petitioner. No
order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
___________________________
JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 04.04.2025 KAS
252
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 8899/2025
Date: 04.04.2025 KAS