HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 44390 of 2013 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. The instant matter relates to the year 2013. On a previous date, on account of non-presence of petitioner's counsel, the matter was adjourned and directed to be listed as peremptorily. 2. The matter was taken up in the revised list. However, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition, nor has any adjournment slip been moved. Learned counsel for the respondents is present. 3. In the absence of any effective representation, it appears that the cause of action has become stale and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 5. In case the petitioners feel that the matter still survives, liberty is granted to them to move an application for recalling this order within two months from today. October 6, 2025 Priya Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : M.H. Khan, Sharad Mandhyan Counsel for Respondent(s) : V.K.Maheshwari (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Smt. Sunita Singh And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Special Secy. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRIYA KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad