SHIV KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. U.P. LKO.
ABAIL/609/2025 · 2025-09-04
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 141310 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 141310 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 609 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1.Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State. 2.The present second anticipatory application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in complaint case No.1958 of 2021 under sections 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., P.S. Kotwali Rudauli, district Ayodhya,, the first having been rejected vide order dated 3.10.2024 passed by this court in anticipatory Bail No.2290 of 2024. . 3.Learned counsel for applicant, after arguing for some time, submits that he does not want to press the anticipatory bail application; rather he may be granted liberty to file regular bail application and the same may be decided in the light of judgment of Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another Special Leave to Appeal (Cri)No.5191 of 2021. 4.In view of the above, prayer for anticipatory bail is refused and the application is dismissed as not pressed. However, it is provided that in case the applicant files a regular bail application within two weeks from today, the same be decided expeditiously, strictly in view of the law laid down by Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). September 4, 2025kkb/ Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anuj Pandey, Anand Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Shiv Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench