Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:10506
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No. 2206 of 2025 25 November, 2025
Anmol Deswaal
--Applicant Versus
State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Present:
1. Mr. R.P.Nautiyal, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. Vinay Bisht and Mr. Sachin Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Ms. Meenakshi Sharma, learned Brief Holder for the State.
Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. (Oral) (Through V.C.)
Present applicant Anmol Deswaal, S/o Pradeep Kumar is praying for bail in relation to FIR dated 09.08.2025, bearing FIR No. 0143 of 2025, registered at P.S. Rajpur, District Dehradun, which was lodged against unknown person for the offence punishable under Sections 109 of BNS 2023.
2.
It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated which is evident from the fact that the FIR has been lodged against unknown person. He submits that the charge sheet has already been filed on 04.10.2025 and as per the charge sheet the main accused is Gautam Ahla6+wat and the applicant has been implicated only for Section 3(5) of BNS 2023. He submits that there was no such common intention and the charge sheet has been filed against the applicant in a very casual manner. He 1
2025:UHC:10506 further submits that the applicant is languishing in jail since 10.08.2025 and there is no need of custodial interrogation of the applicant and be enlarged on bail.
3.
On the other side, Ms. Meenakshi Sharma, learned Brief Holder has not disputed this fact that the charge sheet has already been filed on 04.10.2025 and, as per the prosecution the main accused is Gautam Ahlawat.
4.
After hearing the arguments of the learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that as per the charge sheet the main accused is Gautam Ahlawat and the applicant is languishing in jail since 10.08.2025, and since the charge sheet has been filed, there is no need of custodial interrogation of the applicant, this Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves for bail.
5.
Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the bail application is allowed.
6.
Let the applicant “Anmol Deswaal” be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 25.11.2025 Nahid
2