Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14129 (BOM)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS v. SAVITRIBAI KASHIRAM CHAUDHARI

CA/7326/2013 · 2025-09-10

Shri Kishore C Sant

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 923-CA 9784-2018.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9784 OF 2018 IN FAST/10682/2013 The State Of Maharashtra And Others .. Applicants Versus Savitribai Kashiram Chaudhari (died) Through L.Rs. Chagan And Others .. Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7325 OF 2013 IN FAST/10682/2013 The State Of Maharashtra And Others .. Applicants Versus Savitribai Kashiram Chaudhari (died) Through her Special P.A., Chhagan Kashiram Chaudhari .. Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7326 OF 2013 IN FAST/10682/2013 The State Of Maharashtra And Others .. Applicants Versus Savitribai Kashiram Chaudhari (died) Through her Special P.A., Chhagan Kashiram Chaudhari .. Respondent 1 of 4 2025:BHC-AUG:25403 2 923-CA 9784-2018.odt WITH FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 10682 OF 2013 The State Of Maharashtra And Others .. Appellants Versus Savitribai Kashiram Chaudhari (died) Through her Special P.A., Chhagan Kashiram Chaudhari .. Respondent AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7327 OF 2013 IN FAST/10697/2013 The State Of Maharashtra And Others .. Applicants Versus Jagannath Amrut Patil Since deceased through his L.Rs. Shivaji Jagannath Patil and others .. Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7328 OF 2013 IN FAST/10697/2013 The State Of Maharashtra And Others .. Applicants Versus Jagannath Amrut Patil Since deceased through his L.Rs. Shivaji Jagannath Patil and others .. Respondents WITH FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 10697 OF 2013 The State Of Maharashtra And Others .. Appellants Versus 2 of 4 3 923-CA 9784-2018.odt Jagannath Amrut Patil Since deceased through his L.Rs. Shivaji Jagannath Patil and others .. Respondents Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for the Applicants/Appellants. CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT, J. DATE : 10th SEPTEMBER, 2025. PER COURT :- CIVIL APPLICATIONS FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY : 1. Heard learned A.G.P. for the applicants. 2. Though the service in the civil application is not completed, this Court is taking up the matter for deciding the appeals. For the reasons stated in the applications, delay stands condoned. The applications are allowed. FIRST APPEALS : 1. These appeals are filed challenging judgment and award passed by learned Ad-hoc District Judge-1, Amalner dated 23.01.2007 in L.A.R. Nos. 622/1993 and 623/1993. The learned Court by way of impugned judgment and award has enhanced the amount of compensation from Rs. 1350/- to Rs. 7497/- in L.A.R. No. 622/1993. In L.A.R. No. 623/1993 the amount of compensation is enhanced from Rs. 1600/- to Rs. 13,328/- 3 of 4 4 923-CA 9784-2018.odt 2. Considering the meager amount of enhancement this Court finds that, keeping the first appeals pending would be of no use. This Court, therefore, finds that the appeals deserve to be dismissed. The same are hereby dismissed. No order as to costs. 3. In view of disposal of first appeals, pending civil applications for stay and civil application for bringing on record legal heirs also stand disposed of. ( KISHORE C. SANT, J. ) P.S.B. 4 of 4