HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 516 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Abhishek Mishra, the learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Mohd. Asif Khan, the learned A.G.A.-I appearing on behalf of the State and perused the records. 2. The applicant was granted interim anticipatory bail by means of the following order passed by a coordinate Bench of this Court on 26.05.2025: "1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the opposite parties no.1 & 2- State. 2. Issue notice to the opposite parties No.3 & 4. 3. This first anticipatory bail application has been filed with regard to Crime No.0037 of 2025, under Sections 119(1), 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3) B.N.S., 2023, Police Station Gomti Nagar Extension, District Lucknow. 4. As per contents of the F.I.R., the incident is said to have taken place on 24.02.2025 at about 10:45 P.M. when the applicant along with co-accused is said to have assaulted the informant and his friend resulting in injuries. 5. It has been submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the charges framed against him and that a general role of inflicting injuries has been assigned but no specific role has been assigned to the applicant. It is submitted that even otherwise all the sections Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Azam Shafeequi, Abhishek Mishra, Swati Bisaria, Viplav Sahu Counsel for Opposite Party(s): G.A., Alok Pandey, Farhan Ahmad Khan, Mohd. Saud Khan Raghvendra P. Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) implicated against the applicant carry a maximum punishment of less than 7 years and therefore, subsequently, Section 119 (1) BNS has been added. 6. It is also submitted that the applicant does not have any previous criminal history and the injuries, as indicated, are trivial and simple in nature. 7. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail with the submission that there is ample CCTV footage which corroborates the allegations levelled against the applicant as well as the statement of the injured recorded under Section 180 of BNSS also corroborates the same. It is, however, admitted that the applicant does not have any previous criminal history and that the injuries sustained are simple in nature. It is also admitted that a general role has been allocated to the application for causing injuries. 8. Upon consideration of submissions advanced by learned counsel for parties and perusal of material on record, prima facie, it appears that a general role has been allocated to the applicant of causing injuries, which are also simple in nature. The applicant does not have any previous criminal history. The altercation appears to have taken place due to some trivial dispute. 9. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, till the next date of listing, the present applicant- Raghvendra P. Singh shall be released forthwith, in case of his arrest in the aforesaid F.I.R. (supra) on an interim anticipatory bail on his furnishing personal bond and two solvent sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or tamper with the evidence; (ii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court; (iii)The applicant shall not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness; (iv)The applicant shall appear before the trial court on each date fixed unless personal presence is exempted; (v) In case of breach of any of the above conditions the court below shall have the liberty to cancel the bail; 10. Any other reasonable restrictions/conditions which the trial court may deem fit and proper can be imposed. 11. Connect and list alongwith Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 482 BNSS No.340 of 2025, as fresh alongwith service report. 12. Objections may be filed in the meantime." NABAIL No. 516 of 2025 2 3. The office has reported that the notices to the opposite parties has been served, but they have not put in appearance for opposing the anticipatory bail application. The State has also not filed any counter affidavit. 4. The learned A.G.A.-I could not point out any misuse of interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicant. 5. No material has come to light which may persuade this court to take a view different from the one taken by the coordinate Bench. 6. In view of above, the interim order dated 26.05.2025 is made absolute and the anticipatory bail application is allowed in terms of the aforesaid interim order. September 19, 2025 Ram. NABAIL No. 516 of 2025 3 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench