SACHIN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
NABAIL/500/2025 · 2025-09-19
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 141269 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 141269 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 500 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1.Case called out. Nobody is present on behalf of the applicant to press the instant application and no request of adjournment of the case has been made. However, Sri Ashok Kumar Srivastava, the learned A.G.A is present.
2. The State has file a counter affidavit stating that the investigation stands concluded, a charge sheet has been filed which does not levelled any charge against the applicant and, therefore, he has no apprehension of arrest.
3. Accordingly, the application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
September 19, 2025 Preeti Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dinesh Kumar Ojha Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Sachin .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench