KULTAR SINGH v. KABRISTAN/GRAVEYARD COMMITTEE, NARAYANPUR,
CLR/55/2013 · 2025-10-28
Rakesh Thapliyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14125 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14125 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:9490 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
CLR No.55 of 2013 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
1. None appears for the revisionists.
2. Mr. I.P. Kohli, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent No.2.
3. Mr. Krishan Kant Joshi,
learned counsel, holding brief of Mr. Dharmendra Barthwal,
learned counsel for the respondent No.3.
4. On 03.07.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the revisionists.
5. Mr. I.P. Kohli, learned Standing Counsel for the State apprise to this Court that the revisionists No. 2 and 4 already died and for substitution of their legal heirs, the substitution application was moved, but the same was also dismissed on 03.07.2025.
6. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the revisionists. It appears that the revisionists are not interested to pursue this matter.
7. Accordingly, the present revision is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)
28.10.2025 R.Bisht
2025:UHC:9490