Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14125 (KAR)

AXIS BANK LTD. v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/844/2025 · 2025-03-25

Hemant Chandangoudar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:12660 CRL.P No. 844 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 844 OF 2025 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. AXIS BANK LTD., A BANKING COMPANY CARRYING ON THE BANKING BUSINESS UNDER THE BANKING REGULATION ACT, 1949, INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 AND HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 'TRISHUL' 3RD FLOOR, OPP: SAMARTHESHWAR TEMPLE LAW GARDEN, ELLIS BRIDGE, AHMEDABAD - 380006. GUJARAT AND HAVING ONE OF ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT SUNRISE BUILDING, GROUND FLOOR, DESABHIMANI ROAD, KEERTHI NAGAR, ELAMAKKARA ROAD - 682 026 REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH HEAD, MRS. DEEPA P, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, ALSO AT W/O SREEKANTH .H., 9A, ROYAL DREAM FLAT. SANSKRIT COLLEGE, ROAD. NEAR CHAKKANKULANGARA TRIPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM-682301 …PETITIONER Digitally signed by R HEMALATHA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:12660 CRL.P No. 844 of 2025 (BY SRI. UNNIKRISHNAN M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY NORTH EAST CEN CRIME POLICE STATION, NORTH EAST DIVISION BANGALORE DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY SPP HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE 01. 2. SRI. K.K RAGHAVENDRA, S/O. K.L KRISHNASETTY AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO C-104, MASTER CLASSIC RESIDENCY, SURABHI LAYOUT, 2ND MAIN, 4TH CROSS, NEHRU NAGAR, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU CITY, KARNATAKA-560064 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAHUL RAI, HCGP FOR R1; SMT. V. NAGAMANI, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRL.P FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 23.08.2024 PASSED BY THE HONBLE 45TH ADDL. CJM, BANGALORE, IN CRIME NO.581/2024 I.E., ANNECURE-C IN TERMS OF WHICH, THE PETITIONER IS DIRECTED TO DEFREEZE THE SAVINGS/ CURRENT ACCOUNT BEARING NO.923020044228422 MAINTAINED IN THE PETITIONERS BANK AND TRANSFER THE SAME TO THE ACCOUNT OF THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:12660 CRL.P No. 844 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR ORAL ORDER The petitioner which is a Financial Institution is before this Court challenging the order passed by 1st Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate on an application filed under Sections 451 and 457 of Cr.P.C. by the complainants/respondent No.2 directing the petitioner-Bank to defreeze the amount belonging to the accused and transfer the said amount to the bank account of the complainants/respondent No.2. 2. The petitioner’s concern is that the order passed by the Jurisdictional Magistrate cannot be executed because it surpasses the specified release amount, and numerous courts across the Country have issued directives to the investigating agencies to unfreeze the bank accounts of the accused therein. 3. The learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent No.1 - State on instructions would suggest that the matter may be remanded to the Jurisdictional Courts to consider the application filed under Sections 451 and 457 of Cr.P.C. afresh, by affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 4. Admittedly, multiple cases are registered against the accused herein within the State and across the country and there are multiple orders passed by the Jurisdictional Magistrates directing the petitioner to unfreeze the account of the accused and transfer the amount to the bank account of the complainants. The passing of multiple orders has caused - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:12660 CRL.P No. 844 of 2025 difficulty to the petitioner/bank in executing the said order, since the amount ordered to be released in some accounts exceeds the amount available in the subject accounts of the accused. Therefore, the learned Magistrate before passing an order directing the petitioner to unfreeze and transfer the amount to the accounts of the complainants, is required to hear the petitioner. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. The order dated 23.8.2024 passed in Crime No.581/2024 by the learned 45th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bangalore is hereby set aside. Sd/- (HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR) JUDGE BKM List No.: 3 Sl No.: 0