RAKESH DAS U/A 227 v. DISTRICT JUDGE BARABANKI and OTHERS
A227/6212/2012 · 2025-04-01
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 141246 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 141246 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18023 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6212 of 2012 Petitioner :- Rakesh Das U/A 227 Respondent :- District Judge Barabanki And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Chandra Gupta,Suyash Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- Manish Kumar,Akhter Abbas,Vinod Kr. Singh Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. An illness slip has been sent by one of the counsel Sri Suyash Gupta. The other counsel is not present even in the revised call. Considering the fact that the petition is of the year 2012, I do not see any reason to interfere. Considering the fact that the proceedings arise out on the amendment application, I do not see as to why, the petition could have been rejected under
Order 7 Rule 11 as was averred before the trial Court. The petition lacks merit and is accordingly dismissed. If the suit is pending, the same shall be decided expeditiously preferably within a period of one year. Let a copy of this order be sent to the trial Court for compliance.
Order Date :- 1.4.2025 Arun Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench