HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CPSW No. 30/2015 in SWP No. 2582/2013 Davinder Singh …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: None. Vs Nirmal Sharma, Secy. Education & Ors. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER (13.10.2025) 01. Record reveals that the instant contempt petition has been preferred against the order/judgment dated 29.11.2013 passed in SWP No. 2582/2013, in which four weeks’ notice was issued for filing of statement of facts as well as compliance report way back on 26.02.2015. 02. Today, the instant contempt petition has come up before this Court after 10 years and during this intervening period no efforts have been made by the petitioner to get the instant petition listed. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner perhaps for the reason that order/judgment stands complied with. 03. In the aforesaid backdrop, no fruitful purpose will be served to keep this contempt petition alive. Accordingly, proceedings in the instant contempt petition are closed. Rule if any shall stand discharged. (WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE Jammu 13.10.2025 Renu Serial No.203 Renu Bala 2025.10.14 00:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document