Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14121 (CHH)

MAHOBIYA SINGH v. SAVITA

WPC/1709/2025 · 2025-04-03

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:15724 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1709 of 2025 1 - Mahobiya Singh D/o Devicharan Aged About 35 Years Caste Gond R/o Village Dhartipara, Tahsil Gatgaon Block And Tehsil Bhaiyathan, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Savita W/o Ramkumar Aged About 25 Years Caste Gond R/o Village Dhartipara, Block And Tehsil Bhaiyathan, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Sub Divisional Officer (Rev.)/ Prescribed Authority (S.D.O) Bhaiyathan, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Returning Officer (Panchayat) Janpad Panchayat, Bhaiyathan, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Presiding Officer Booth No. 06. Primary School Building, Village Dhartipara, Block And Tehsil Bhaiyathan, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Presiding Officer Booth No. 07 Primary School Building, Village Juna Dhartipara, Block And Tehsil Bhaiyathan, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner :- Mrs. A. Sandhya Rao, Advocate For Respondents :- Mr. Shobhit Mishra, Advocate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order On Board 03.04.2025 VISHAKHA BEOHAR Digitally signed by VISHAKHA BEOHAR 2 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the application for recounting of general votes has not been decided by the respondent authorities. As such, the petition is filed. 2. Since, the result has already been declared in favour of the respondent No. 1 and she has been elected for the post of Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat-Dharrtipara, as such, the petitioner is required to file an appropriate election petition before the competent authority. 3. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition with liberty to file an appropriate election petition before the prescribed authorities. 4. Prayer made is fair and reasonable. 5. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty reserved in favour of the petitioner. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Vishakha