Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 141180 (ALL)

ANIL KUMAR MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/5621/2025 · 2025-05-21

Karunesh Singh Pawar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:30294 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5621 of 2025 Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Mishra Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vivek Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos. 1 to 3. 2. Learned Standing Counsel submits that the candidature of the petitioner for promotion to a higher post has been rejected. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that the petitioner has not received any rejection order. He prays that the pending representation of the petitioner may be directed to be decided. He further submits that there is neither any official communication regarding the rejection nor has a copy of the rejection order been provided to the petitioner. 4. Considering the aforesaid submissions, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to submit a fresh representation before respondent no. 2, the Consolidation Commissioner, U.P., Lucknow within two weeks from today. If such a representation is submitted, respondent no. 2 shall consider and decide the same by passing a reasoned and speaking order within four weeks thereafter. Respondent no. 2 shall also ensure that a copy of the original rejection order is provided to the petitioner. Order Date :- 21.5.2025 Madhu D.R/P.S Digitally signed by :- MADHU KUMARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench