Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010126222025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3274/2025 PAROMITA ROY SAHA AND ORS W/O. BIPUL SAHA, WARD COMMISSIONER, WARD NO. 01, LANKA MUNICIPAL BOARD, HOJAI. 2: RAM PRASAD RAY S/O. MANURANJAN RAY WARD COMMISSIONER WARD NO. 08 LANKA MUNICIPAL BORAD HOJAI. 3: HIBJUR RAHMAN S/O. SAFIQUR RAHMAN WARD COMMISSIONER WARD NO. 03 LANKA MUNICIPAL BOARD HOJAI. 4: BISWAJIT DEB S/O. ARUN CHANDRA DEB WARD COMMISSIONER WARD NO. 11 LANKA MUNICIPAL BOARD HOJAI. 5: PARTHA SARATHI PAUL S/O. BHUPAL CHANDRA PAUL WARD COMMISSIONER WARD NO. 02 LANKA MUNICIPAL BOARD HOJAI VERSUS Page No.# 2/4 THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPTT., DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6. 2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER HOJAI. 3:THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER (CIVIL) HOJAI SANKARDEVNAGAR NAGAON ASSAM. 4:THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER LANKA MUNICIPAL BOARD LANKA HOJAI. 5:ABHIJIT DAS S/O. MANORANJAN DAS R/O. PUNJABI BOSTI P.O. LANKA HOJAI WARD COMMISSIONER WARD NO. 04 LANKA MUNICIPAL BOARD HOJAI. 6:KANCHAN SHIL DAS W/O. SUKUMAR DAS R/O. SUBHASH NAGAR P.O. LANKA HOJAI WARD COMMISSIONER WARD NO. 05 LANKA MUNICIPAL BOARD HOJAI. 7:MOUSHUMI DAS DEY W/O. PINKU DEY R/O. NETAJI ROAD LANKA TOWN P.O. LANKA HOJAI WARD COMMISSIONER WARD NO. 06 Page No.# 3/4 LANKA MUNICIPAL BOARD HOJAI. 8:RAJIV CHANDRA SHIL S/O. LATE SUNIL CHANDRA SHIL R/O. COLLEGE ROAD LANKA TOWN P.O. LANKA HOJAI WARD COMMISSIONER WARD NO. 07 LANKA MUNICIPAL BOARD HOJAI. 9:MITRA CHANDA PAUL W/O. PREMANU PAUL R/O. NETAJI ROAD LANKA TOWN P.O. LANKA HOJAI WARD COMMISSIONER WARD NO. 09 LANKA MUNICIPAL BOARD HOJAI. 10:ROMA MAJUMDER W/O. MANURANJAN MAJUNDER R/O. DESHBANDHU PATH LANKA TOWN P.O. LANKA HOJAI WARD COMMISSIONER WARD NO. 10 LANKA MUNICIPAL BOARD HOJAI Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S K TALUKDAR, MR. J M A CHOUDHURY,T R OVUNG,MS. S T BOKTH Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, Page No.# 4/4 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 01.08.2025 Shri S.K. Talukdar, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted on instructions that by efflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous. Also heard Shri J. Handique, learned State Counsel and Shri R. Ali, learned counsel for the private respondents. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant