Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14113 (AP)

BATHINA JOSHNA v. BATHINA MAHESH

TRCMP/127/2025 · 2025-06-22

Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V. GOPALA KRISHNA TRANS. CIVIL MISC.PETITION NO: 127 OF 2025 RAO Between: Bathina Joshna, W/o.Mahesh, aged 26 1-00, RK Palli, Chandra Sekhara Chintapadu, Prakasam District. years. House wife, R/o.D.No. Puram Mandalam, Musunooru ...Petitioner AND Bathina Mahesh, S/o.Malyadri, aged Darga Plots, Bhavanipuram, Vijayawada- 520012. 32 years, R/o.D.No.79-1-128B ...Respondent Petition filed under Section 24 of the C.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court pleased to withdraw and transfer the F. the file of IV Additional District and Sessions of Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kandukur, lA NO: 1 OF may bo C.O.P No.128 of 2025 pending on Judge, Vijayawada to the Court Prakasam District. Petition filed under Section 151 CPC praying that in the Circumstances stated in the affidavit filed i Court may be pleased to in support of the petition, the High stay all further proceedings including the petitioner’s appearance in FCOP No.128 of 2025 on the file of IV Additional r District and Sessions Judge, Vijayawada pending disposal of the above Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner :Sri Pavan Kumar Pasupuleti i' Counsel for the Respondent The Court made the following; THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO TRANSFER CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION N0.127 OF 2025 ORDER: Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing, It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondent/husband herein has not pressed the F.C.O.P.No.128 of 2025 on the file of the IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vijayawada, Krishna District and the same was dismissed by the trial Court as not pressed and that the present Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition has become “infructuous”. 1. 2. The representation made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is recorded. 3. Therefore, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. Sd/- K.KASIRAO ACHARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To The IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vijayawada, Krishna District. One CC to Sri Pavan Kumar Pasupuleti, Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copies 1. 2. 3. BSV r HIGH COURT DATED:23/06/2025 ORDER TRCMP.No.127 of 2025 DISMISSING THE TR.CMP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS