- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2451 WP No. 1636 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 1636 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI TANISH BASHA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, S/O KHAJA HUSEN, PROPRIETOR, MUBARAK GENERAL ENGINEERING WORKS, NEAR MRF TYRES RE-BUTTON, BESIDE TAYAMMA TEMPLE, ADONI ROAD, SIRUGUPPA-BALLARI DISTRICT. 2. SMT BANU BEE AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, W/O TANISH BASHA, PROPRIETOR, THUNGABHADRA KRUSHI KENDRA, SADA SHIVA NAGAR, BESIDE PRASHANTHI TYRES, ADONI ROAD, SIRUGUPPA-BALLARI DISTRICT-583 121. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. HARISH.G., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, REPRESENTED BY COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE, SHESHADRI ROAD, BANGALORE-01. 2. JOINT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, D.C. OFFICE COMPLEX, HOSPET ROAD, Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2451 WP No. 1636 of 2021 KOPPAL DISTRICT-583 231. 3. JOINT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, TALUK OFFICE COMPOUND, OPPOSITE D.C.OFFICE, BALLARI DISTRICT-583 101. 4. ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, VIGILANCE CELL, SECRETARIAT DIVISION, AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT, 3RD FLOOR, PODIUM BLOCK, V.V.TOWER, BANGALORE-560 001. 5. JOINT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, NANDI COLONY, BIDAR DISTRICT-585 401. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA RAYAPPA., AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioners are not represented. When the case is listed and is called out, the advocate must be present. His absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 16.01.2025, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners, either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, for appearance of counsel - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:2451 WP No. 1636 of 2021 for the petitioners, the petition was ordered to be listed on 21.01.2025. The petition is listed today for appearance of counsel for the petitioners. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioners are not represented. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 3 Sl No.: 29