APHC010171612020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 10842/2020 Between: Koratana Sathyam, ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T VENU GOPAL Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2 The Court made the following: The petitioner claims that he is the absolute owner and possessor of land admeasuring an extent of 49 Sq yrds in Sy.No.27/25 of Vempadam Village, Pusapatirega Mandal, Vizianagaram District, having inherited the same from his ancestors. It is further case of the petitioner that his name is mutated in revenue records and the 4th respondent issued pattadar passbooks in his favor. He further claims that he is regularly paying land tax over the subject property and evidencing the proof, he filed land tax receipts. It is further case of the petitioner that on 19.06.2020, the respondent Nos.4 to 6 entered into the subject land and started making measurements and directed the petitioner to vacate from the subject land. Questioning the said action of the respondents in trying to dispossess the petitioner from the subject land without issuing any notice or following due process of law, the present writ petition is filed. 2. While ordering notice, this Court, by order dated 03.07.2020, directed the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the subject land without following due process of law. 3 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue would submit that in view of the interim orders passed by this Court on 03.07.2020, the respondents had not initiated any action against the petitioner. It is further represented that, in case the subject land is required by the respondents, the same would be resumed after following due process of law. 4. Taking into consideration the submissions made by both the parties, this Court feels that it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the subject land except in accordance with law. 5. With the above direction, the present writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR Dt.03.04.2025 DSB 4 152 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR W.P.No.10842 of 2020 Date: 03.04.2025 DSB