Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 141015 (ALL)

VIJNESH KUMAR @ (IN FIR VIJNESH MAURYA) v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/4349/2025 · 2025-08-27

Rajesh Singh Chauhan, S Q H Rizvi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4349 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J. HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for the State. 2. Learned AGA for the State informs that the investigation has been concluded and police report has been submitted in the present case. 3. In the wake of aforesaid development, nothing remains to be adjudicated in this writ petition, therefore, this writ petition is consigned to record. . August 27, 2025 Om Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vivek Kumar Mishra, Paritosh Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Vijnesh Kumar @ (In Fir Vijnesh Maurya) .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- OM PRAKASH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench