NISAR AHMED AND OTHERS v. UT OF J AND K TH TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER, JAMMU AND OTHERS
WP(C)/3283/2025 · 2025-11-28
Rahul Bharti
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14100 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14100 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 3283/2025 CM No. 7489/2025
Nisar Ahmed & Ors.
…..Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Ch. Nayaz Ahmed Naz, Advocate.
Vs
UT of J&K & Ors. .….Respondent(s) Through:
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
ORDER (28.11.2025)
01. The writ petition is suffering lack of clarity of presentation of case on account of deficiency of facts and, therefore, this Court allows withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty reserved in favour of the petitioners to come up with the fresh writ petition bearing all the essential facts and the details related therewith to show as to how they are aggrieved on account of being charged for parking of their respective vehicles at Bus Stand, Mendhar.
02. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU
28.11.2025
Shivalee
Serial No. 04 Shivalee Khajuria 2025.12.02 16:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document