Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:15507 Court No. - 70 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 828 of 2025 Applicant :- Vikal Kumar And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Upendra Upadhyay Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J. 1. Sri Indu Shekhar Tripathi and Sri Sandeep Kumar Gupta Advocates have filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no. 2. The same is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants; learned A.G.A. for State and perused the record. 3. The instant Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicants in Case Crime No.118 of 2024, under Section 307 I.P.C., P.S. Mirhachi, District Etah, during pendency of trial. 4. After arguing the matter to some extent, learned counsel for applicants submits that present anticipatory bail application may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a bail application which may be decided in view of law laid down by Supreme Court in "Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922" to which learned A.G.A. has no objection. 5. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the applicants, namely, Vikal Kumar and Pavan Kumar appear before the trial court within two weeks from today and apply for regular bail, the same shall be decided expeditiously, in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 6. For the period of two weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicants before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against them. 7. The petition is disposed of accordingly. Order Date :- 4.2.2025 Meenu Singh Digitally signed by :- MEENU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad