Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sandeep Parmar vs. Gami Mohd. & Ors.
CMP(M) No.1705 of 2025 05.03.2026 Present: Mr. Ashok K. Tyagi, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Shyam Singh Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 8. None for respondents No.9 & 10. Ms. Mamta Devi, Advocate vice Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.11.
CMP(M) No.1705 of 2025 Since none has appeared on behalf of respondents No. 9 & 10 despite repeated calls, they are ordered to be proceeded against ex parte Power of Attorney on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 8, is stated to have been filed, however, the same is not on record. Registry is directed to trace and place the same on record, if in order. No reply to the application is intended to be filed on behalf of the contesting respondents and they have no objection, in case, the same is allowed. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which are duly supported with an affidavit of the applicant Sandeep Parmar, the same is allowed and delay of 30 days in filing the present appeal is hereby condoned. Application stands disposed of. FAO No.________of 2026 Be registered.
Admit. Post Admission Notice. Mr. Shyam Singh Chauhan and Ms. Mamta Devi, Advocates, appear and waive service of post admission notice on behalf respondent No.1 to 8 and respondent No.11, respectively. List for final hearing in due course. CMP No.______ of 2026 Be registered. Heard. Subject to deposit of the entire award amount alongwith up-to-date interest within a period of six weeks from today, the execution of award dated 03.03.2025, passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-I, Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, H.P. in case titled Gami Mohd. & Ors. vs. Sandeep Parmar & Ors., shall remain stayed during the pendency of the present appeal. Application stands disposed of. Alteration, vacation and modification on motion.
( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge March 05, 2026 (reena)