NARESH BALA AND ANR. v. STATE TH.SOCIAL WELFARE DEPTT.AND ORS.
SWP/1868/2015 · 2025-12-17
Javed Iqbal Wani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14099 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14099 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SWP No. 1868/2015 Page 1 of 3
Sr. No. 62 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case No.:-SWP No. 1868/2015 IA No. 01/2015
Date of Pronouncement:-17.12.2025 Uploaded on:- 22.12.2025
Naresh Bala and Anr. …. Petitioner(s)
Through:- Mr. Nakul Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate. V/s
State of J&K and ors.
…..Respondent(s)
Through:- Mr. Nirmal K Kotwal, Adv. vice Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
ORDER(ORAL)
1. Through the medium of the instant petition, the petitioners herein have sought the following reliefs:-
“(a) Writ of certiorari quashing order No. 13-SMD of 2015 dated 22.04.2015 issued by the respondent No. 3, which has effect of disengagement/termination of the services of the petitioners as Anganwari Workers/Helpers engaged and discharging their duties as such from the last so many years. (b) Writ of mandamus, commanding the respondents to allow the petitioners to discharge their duties as Anganwari Workers/Helpers having been engaged on ad-hoc/temporary basis and continued for number of years and discharging their duties for the best satisfaction of the authorities till date. (c) Writ of mandamus, commanding the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioners as has been done in case of similarly situated persons of various departments including PDD. (d) Any other writ, order, command or directions, which this Court deems proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and those to be urged at the time of hearing, be passed in favour of petitioners and against the respondents.”
2. According to the counsel for the petitioners herein is that being fully eligible, they were engaged as Anganwari Workers/Helpers on ad-hoc/temporary basis by the respondents and while working
SWP No. 1868/2015 Page 2 of 3
as such in their respective Anganwari Centres in Block Budhal, District Rajouri for the last so many years and that despite the petitioners’ satisfactory working at their respective Anganwari Centres, the respondent 3 herein being State Mission Director, ICDS Jammu issued Order No. 13-SMD of 2015 dated 22.04.2015, directing the termination of the petitioners and other similarly placed Anganwari Workers/Helpers without any lawful justification, which compelled the petitioners to file the instant writ petition before this Court. 3. Objections to the instant petition have filed by the respondents, wherein the petition is being opposed, inter-alia, on the premise that the petitioners’ engagements were made in violation of the applicable rules, despite there being a prescribed procedure under the ICDS guidelines and Government Order No. 07-SW of 2010 dated 18.01.2010 including Government Order No. 10-SW of 2010 dated 19.01.2010, as such, the order dated 22.04.2015 was issued in compliance with the Government Order No. 384-GAD of 2015 dated 17.03.2015. Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record. 4.
According to the learned counsel for the petitioners, the issues involved in the instant petition stand settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in a batch of writ petition being SWP No. 1222/2015 as a lead case and titled as “Sunita Kumar and ors. Vs. State of J&K and ors.” reported in 2018 (4) JKLT 420 and would, therefore, pray that the instant petition be disposed
SWP No. 1868/2015 Page 3 of 3
of in the same manner and on the same analogy, to which, the
learned counsel for the respondents expressed no objection.
5. It is discernible from the record that the petitioners herein were admittedly engaged as Anganwari Workers/Helpers in different Anganwari Centres in Block Budhal, District Rajouri, which fact is not disputed by the respondents.
6. A closer examination of the record as also the judgment (supra) rendered by a Coordinate Bench of this Court, inasmuch as the issues involved therein, it is manifestly clear that the said
judgment is squarely applicable to the case of the petitioners herein.
7. Accordingly, the instant petition succeeds, as a consequence whereof, the respondents are commanded to treat the case of the petitioners herein at par with the petitioners in SWP No. 1222/2015 (supra), rendering them eligible and entitled to all the reliefs granted by the Court therein.
8.
Disposed of along with connected applications.
9. Registry is directed to place a copy of the judgment delivered in SWP No. 1222/2015 on the record file of the present petition.
(JAVED IQBAL WANI)
JUDGE
JAMMU 17.12.2025 Ram Krishan
Whether the order is speaking? Yes
Whether the order is reportable? Yes/No Ram Krishan 2025.12.22 13:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document