Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 140989 (ALL)

M/S GRANITE HILL PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. THRU. ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SRI PURAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. INFRASTRUCTURE AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT,LKO. AND ANOTHER

WRIC/4268/2023 · 2025-05-15

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:28707 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4268 of 2023 Petitioner :- M/S Granite Hill Properties Pvt. Ltd. Thru. Its Authorized Representative Sri Puran Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Infrastructure And Industrial Development,Lko. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhishek Khare,Ayush Chaudhary,Rakesh Kumar Chaudhary,Sudeep Kumar,Waseeq Uddin Ahmed Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., Waseeq Uddin Ahmed Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. 1. Heard Sri Rakesh Kumar Chaudhary, Advocate assisted by Sri Abhishek Khare, Ms. Aahuti Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Waseeq Uddin Ahmed, learned counsel for the respondent and perused the record. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 25.04.2023, whereby the revision filed by the petitioner was disposed of. 3. The neat submission of the counsel for the petitioner is that the claims to which, the petitioner was entitled were not granted by the revisional Court, however, he claims that subsequently on 21.12.2023, a new policy decision has been taken by the respondents and the petitioner would be entitled to the benefits in terms of the said policy decision, which according to the petitioner has been extended to the other person also. 4. The counsel of the respondent states that the said policy decision was taken on 21.12.2023, as such, the case of the petitioner was not considered in the light of the new policy decision. 5. In view thereof, the revisional order dated 25.04.2023 is set aside. The matter is remanded to the revisional authority to pass a fresh order. While doing so, the revisional authority shall take into consideration the subsequent policy decision dated 21.12.2023 as well as, any other plea that may be taken by the revisionist with regard to the benefits given similarly to the other persons. The Revisional Authority shall endeavour to decide the revision afresh within a period of four months. As the petitioner was enjoying an interim protection from this Court, the same is extended till the decision on the revision as directed above. 6. The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the above. Order Date :- 15.5.2025 Arun Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench