Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:24905 Court No. - 6 Case :- S.C.C. REVISION No. - 95 of 2016 Revisionist :- Kamal Ahmad Opposite Party :- Mohd. Yunus And Anr. Counsel for Revisionist :- Umesh Kumar Srivastava,Nirmit Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- Vishwesh Pratap Singh Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. 1. An adjournment has been sought by counsel for the revisionist stating that he has no instructions in the matter, however, as the matter is very old I am not inclined to adjournment the matter. 2. Present revision has been filed challenging the order passed by the JSC Court whereby the suit preferred by the landlord was decreed. 3. Perusal of the impugned judgment records that in the suit instituted by the landlord as many as three issues were framed. The first and second issue with regard to the rights of the landlord to institute proceedings, was decided in favour of the landlord. It was found that there was arrears of rent also and the revisionist had defaulted in payment of rent. 4. Considering the findings of fact recorded after appreciation of evidence, no interference is called for in the revisional jurisdiction 5. Present revision is accordingly dismissed. Order Date :- 30.4.2025 nishant Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench